Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Ein neues Kleid für Andrea

Andrea:  Hallo Ewa!  Ich habe ein großes Problem! 
Ewa:  Was, Andrea?  Kann ich helfen dir? 
Andrea:  Heute esse ich im Restaurant mit Franz, aber ich habe kein schönes Kleid für Tragen!  Ich brauche ein Kleid kaufen vor heute Abend! 
Ewa:  Ach!  Das ist ein wahres großes Problem, Andrea!  Ich komme! 

(später…)  

Andrea:  Ach!  Ich bin so glücklich!  Du bist hier!  Weißt du wo ist der Kleidmarkt? 
Ewa : Ja, definitiv!  Ich arbeite neben den « SchönstekleidderweltMarkt“!  

(Sie laufen…) 

Ewa: Welche Farbe möchtest du dein Kleid? 
Andrea:  Meine Lieblingsfarbe ist Violett, aber ich möchte ein rotes Kleid. 
Ewa: Perfekt!  …  Ach!  Ich habe ein schönes Kleid gefunden! 
Andrea:  Super! (…) Aber ich kann nicht finden die richtige Große…  
Ewa:  Das ist sehr traurig… die Kleider sind viel zu groß!  Du bist so klein!  
Andrea:  Dieses, auf der lefen Seite ist auch gut, aber es ist blau… 
Ewa: …  Ach!!! Ich habe das perfekte Kleid gefunden!  Es ist rot und klein!  
Andrea:  Ja, es ist perfekt!  Ich kaufe dieses Kleid! 
Ewa: Jetzt bist du bereit für den Abend! 
Andrea:  Vielen Dank, Ewa!!!

Friday, December 9, 2011

Are jazz or classical musicians the most dedicated to music?

Are jazz or classical musicians the most dedicated to music?

            Jazz and classical music are both very different styles; jazz is much more modern music while classical is older, but still as good. When it comes to studying, research has shown that ‘’Classical training is a great place to start in music – a strong foundation of sound, technique, and reading benefits musicians for a lifetime.’’[1] It is very hard to start playing an instrument with jazz music because the style requires a background of complex theory.  Jazz musicians are asked to be able to improvise on different changes of chords that are uncommon for the classical musicians. As for the technique, most of jazz players have a very accurate way of playing and are able to swing, while classical musicians do not swing. Although, classical musicians have skills with music reading. They can read hard music sheets really fast and are able to play those pieces almost perfectly the first time they see it. Also, those who study classical music have a tendency to go further in their studies because of the playing ability such thing requires. Another point is that jazz musicians are more open-minded towards different styles of music. They listen and play popular music, funk and R’n’B, soul, blues, rock and roll, country, folk and latin music.
           
Different schools offers program that can develop students’ abilities to play and understand classical or jazz music. For example, Berklee is one of the best music school in North America. It offers a program that forms jazz students, based on their different requirements to improve as a musician, such as sight singing, jazz theory, instrument playing, songwriting, etc. Also, you have the opportunity to play with other students in jazz bands and record songs in a studio. Classical schools offer programs that form the students’ ability to play with an orchestra and their ability to read music.

Our hypothesis is that jazz students, as we said earlier, are more open-minded towards different genres. Furthermore, both classical and jazz students are as dedicated, but jazz students are more passionate. Finally, classical students have a tendency to go further in their studies. This brings us to the results; that will show if our hypothesis is right. 

First, we had to find a way to compare jazz and classical music players.  Since we already live in a context already filled of interaction with other musicians, we decided to limit our survey to music students from the CEGEP, which we thought was realist, but still representative enough.  The point was to find twenty jazz student and twenty classical students so we could compare them, but give a very “objective looking survey”: we wanted them to be honest and tried to remove any form of possible “competition-making” words from our quiz. (ex: Jazz vs. Classical)  We took care of the titles and made sure nothing would allow them to answer with dishonesty and competition.  Only after that we started to find out the right questions which would allow us to truly and efficiently discover which of the two is more dedicated to music.  Of course, we already had some particular questions to ask. (ex: “How many hours per day do you spend on instrumental practice?” or “What level of study do you want to reach in music?”) Nonetheless, we had, in a way, to disguise the survey with lighter questions (ex: “Do you listen to radio broadcasting music?”, “What kind of music do you prefer?” and “What kind of music do you play the most?”) which still would be useful to our later results, but would not necessarily enter as the main comparative points of our future analysis.
Second, in this paragraph, we will show who of the classical or jazz students are more dedicated to music. We asked these two groups various questions on the subject and here are the results. For their favourite music styles, the classical students tend to listen to less genres of music when the jazz students tend to be more open-minded. What was surprising is that the classic students listen to more metal music than jazz students. However, it is unsurprising that the jazz students tend to play different styles of music than the classical students. It was expected because of the “DEC Technique”, which is only available to jazz students; requesting them to play many genres of music. In fact, in the class called “Studio”, they need to play and record two pieces of music per two week. At every two weeks, the style changes. Also, something unexpected because of the previous results, is that the classical student, on a scale from one to ten of their listening of the music on the radio, (one means never and ten means always), tend to be at seven or eight, when jazz students are at three.
In the other part of the survey, we have asked the students: “at what age did you start playing or learning music?” In jazz, all of them answered before 15 and four students on twenty said that they started before the age of five. In classic, none of the students have started before the age of five and five on twenty wrote that they started between fifteen to eighteen years old. For their musical aspirations, only one classical student answered that he had no musical aspiration when none have said yes to that category in classic. The results show that eight people want to teach music in their lives in jazz and classical. The only surprising information is that double of the jazz students want to be part of a musical formation. We have eight in classical when it’s fourteen in jazz. The other results where the same, whether they didn’t know what they wanted to do or if they wanted to become an autonomic musician. Specifically, most of the students in the two groups want to be interprets. Also, most of the students plan to reach the bachelor level of study in university. All of the students allow the same time to their practice.
We can now disproof our hypothesis. In fact, jazz and classical students tend to have the same level of dedication towards music. Jazz students are barely more open-minded than classical. The two groups expect to get the same level of education. From our results, classical students seem to be more passionate to their style of music, when jazz students tend to like and play more styles.     
In conclusion, even though our survey seemed quite complete, we lacked on certain points which would have allowed us to get more accurate results.  For example, it would have been different if we asked the same questions in various regions of the world: Jazz music is more popular in United-States than here, while the attraction pole of classical music takes place in Europe.  But in the context, it wasn’t really realist to consider distribute worldwide survey, by evidence... Also, our sampling was not wide enough; we should’ve asked more musicians (at least twenty-five from each group instead of twenty).  At last, even though we took grand care of the presentation of our survey to diminish the risks of “cheating”, we know that some people probably not answered the truth concerning, for example, the amount of practice they dedicate to their instrument per day. It is so inconstant that we cannot always judge properly by ourselves, and some probably didn’t want to admit they lack practice (not only to us, but also to themselves). Finally, we did not present our information sources.  In the context, it is forgivable because we somehow are “living sources”: we are experts in our domain and got all our knowledge from a so wide number of sources that they can’t be named, but it would still have been better if we could have named some of them.  We think, though, that our results still represent quite well the reality of jazz musicians and classical musicians, which in the end have a somehow an equal level of interest in playing music.


REFERENCES

TAYLOR, Bob. From classical to jazz – making the transition. http://www.visual-jazz.com. 2006.



[1] TAYLOR, Bob. From classical to jazz – making the transition. http://www.visual-jazz.com. 2006.

Friday, September 23, 2011

The Matrix: Is there another reality beyond?

I used to have a friend, at elementary school, who kept on talking to me about The Matrix...  She kept on repeating it was marveillous all the time, and I wouldn't believe her for real until I saw it by myself years later. The Matrix was released in 1999, was written and directed by Andy & Lana Wachowski, and became a very famous movie that inspired a generation.  Even more than ten years later, this work is still very actual on every side.  I think the popularity this movie gained is absolutely deserved on every side.  The storyline is deep and well build, the philosophy and the idea going out this movie are powerful and actual, and the technical stuff is credible and well made. The movie overall truly exceeded my expectations on this level. 

First, I think the storyline (including the setting), is the strongest points of that movie.  The Matrix evolves in a futurist society meanwhile in a more actual one.  The blend is made with such credibility that the viewer can't but reconsider his own universe when watching the movie.  It's nothing about a guy who's able to lift things from the ground: it's about a man who's able to modify a computer program. Anything unrealistic-looking finds its sources on trustable explanations.  They achieved to blend the credibility and the unnatural together perfectly.

Second, the message The Matrix sends us through the movie is very actual and they express it with such powerfulness that it reaches us directly in our beliefs.  There's a strong philosophical message coming in the movie, taking its sources directly from R. Descartes.  "I think, so I am" :  he was the first one to bring this idea of a possible other reality outside these things we think are real.  He claimed the only thing we can be sure about is that we exist in the moment we realise it.  Our whole universe is made of feelings, but how can we know without doubts we're not dreaming?  The Matrix comes directly from this idea who reached time and space till even today, in 2011. "If you've ever had one of those vividly realistic dreams -- the kind that occasionally feels muddled and confusing but contains some moments that are truly exhilarating -- and where upon awakening you aren't sure if what you dreamt really occurred, then you'll begin to understand how you'll feel after seeing "The Matrix." " (Screen it! Review).  This movie has also been very meaningful at the time it was written: it's just when people's fear about the 2000 year's buzz was at its climax.  At this time they feared technology would reach a point where human race would lose control over it.  So, in resume, even though the Matrix used to be more meaningful at its times, it is still a very actual movie which, from my point of view, will still reach time in space for many years over.

Third, the technical stuff was a real innovation at this time: running on walls, slow motion and other special effects were made credibly and very well compare to many movies at this time.  Even if the movie is old, it is not bothering to watch at all. I might even say it flows pretty well.  Also, the fighting scenes are, for the time, innovative: "By hiring Hong Kong Martial Arts master Yuen Wo-Ping to coordinate the fights, the Matrix raised the bar on mainstream American movie fight sequences " (Cyberpunk Review).  Apart from special effects, I think the music was incredible, and gave a very heavy and tense atmosphere to the movie, sometimes, and a very epic atmosphere during the fights. It facilitated the understanding of the movie. The music was exactly what the movie needed.  Also, the colors they used in the movie, which were dark and kind of cyberpunk-looking added tension, credibility and suspense to the movie.  It made us think exactly what they wanted expected us to think when watching:  "I wouldn't like to be living in such a place, effectively." The surnatural and yet effective elements of desing is what permits us to believe into their quest of "saving human race from salvation". 

Finally, I maintain that The Matrix is one of the best film ever made because of its great, original, and meaningful story, its credibility, its strong music and style, its powerful message, and it's timeless actuality.  Overall, I have no negative comment about this movie; it was stunning, simply.    I haven't seen the second and third one, but the end left me on a thirst I rarely have for movies.  And if we were actually trapped in The Matrix... would we ever know it?

Sunday, August 28, 2011

Globe-Trotter Sebastian

  As a sort of presentation, in our first English class, we had to introduce ourselves to someone in the classroom and interview each other.  That's the way I encountered Sebastian and got to know a bit more about his goals, his achievements abilities and interests.

What's interesting about Sebastian is he's been visiting the four continents, all over the world.  He visited Japan, China, Germany, Mexico and many other countries, which makes him a person with an accurate vision of the world and its different cultures.  He knows and understands things in a particular way, according to all the things he's learned from his travelling.  This baggage of knowledge is to him a very precious thing to have considering his high interest for politics, law, economy, diplomacy and geography.  Actually, he wants to become a lawyer.  His next traveling goal is St-Petersburg, in Russia, which I find out is pretty cool.  I think this guy is so lucky to have all these traveling occasions at his hands.  He told me that since he worked for Holiday’s In Hotels, he had discounts on plane tickets and hotel rooms. I envy him so much!!!  I wish I could have this chance too!

Sebastian is also very good at sports:  he apparently is a great runner and swimmer.  Maybe since I’m pretty bad at those, I find this out to be very impressive. He actually succeeded the tests for becoming a Life-Guard, which he is very proud of (the tests are very hard), and he participated to an important marathon in Quebec. 

Anyways, I found out this guy was really interesting to talk to.  This activity permitted me to encounter someone cool, which I am happy of!

**Und ich bin nicht mehr allein in meinem Deutsch Klasse!